Insight on colonoscopy findings in Southern Iraq: Retrospective study from a tertiary center

Main Article Content

Zeinab Kamil Dhahi
Loma Ahmed Almansory

Keywords

colonoscopy, adenoma detection rate, neoplastic lesions

Abstract

Background: Colonoscopy is the most trusted diagnostic tool in the screening and diagnosis of colorectal cancer and other colorectal diseases. Aim: This study intends to present the results of colonoscopic procedures carried out in Center for Digestive and Liver Disease and Surgery in Basrah Methods: Retrospective evaluation of 698 consecutive subjects who underwent screening or diagnostic colonoscopy at Basra Center for Liver Disease and Digestive System between 2014 and February 2020 was conducted. The primary outcome measure was the rate of adenoma detection, calculated alternately as the total number of detected neoplastic lesions divided by the number of subjects screened and as the proportion of subjects with at least one neoplastic lesion. The demographic information, presentation, and colonoscopic findings have been reported as frequencies and percentages. Results: The study involved 400 (57.3%) male and 298 (42.7%) female subjects, with ages ranging from 1 to 90 years and a mean±SD of 42.3±18.6 years. Cecum access rate was 86.8% (606/698), and 48 (6.9%) out of the 698 participants had malignancy. The adenoma detection rate was 12.3% (87 out of 698 patients).  Conclusion: In our study, the success rate, which is determined by the rate of cecum access, was relatively lower than the approved standard due to causes related to the patients. Even so, it is higher than that reported in previous studies. The adenoma detection rate was low, which is likely due to the small sample size as the center is in its early inception.

Abstract 59 | Full PDF Downloads 40

References

1. Siegel RL, Wagle NS, Cercek A, Smith RA, Jemal A. Colorectal cancer statistics, 2023. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2023 May;73(3):233-54.
2. Rawla P, Sunkara T, Barsouk A. Epidemiology of colorectal cancer: incidence, mortality, survival, and risk factors. Gastroenterology Review/Przegląd Gastroenterologiczny. 2019 Jan 6;14(2):89-103.
3. Al Zaabi A, Al Shehhi A, Sayed S, Al Adawi H, Al Faris F, Al Alyani O, Al Asmi M, Al Mirza A, Panchatcharam S, Al-Shaibi M. Early onset colorectal cancer in Arabs, are we dealing with a distinct disease? Cancers. 2023 Jan 31;15(3):889.
4. Elwali NE, Jarrah O, Alzahrani SG, Alharbi MB, Alhejaily AG, Alsharm AA, Elhassan MM. Colorectal cancer in Saudi Arabia: the way forward. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2023;24(1):13.
5. Al-Bahrani ZR, Al-Bahrani AZ. The changes in the incidence of gastric versus colorectal cancer in Iraq during the period between 1965-2006. TOFIQ J Med Sciences. 2013 Sep 4;1(1):1-6.
6. Ibrahem S, Ahmed H, Zangana S. Trends in colorectal cancer in Iraq over two decades: incidence, mortality, topography and morphology. Ann Saudi Med. 2022 Jul;42(4):252-61.
7. Cai W, Zhang X, Luo Y, Ye M, Guo Y, Ruan W. Quality indicators of colonoscopy care: a qualitative study from the perspectives of colonoscopy participants and nurses. BMCHealth Serv Res. 2022 Aug 19;22(1):1064.
8. John AK, Varughese B, Abushaikha SS, Hamdan AM, Pillai V, Ayash AM, Vincent PK, Sultan K, Al Ejji KM, Singh R, Alabdulla S. High adenoma detection rates in fecal immunochemical test-based colorectal cancer screening: interim results of the National Bowel Cancer Screening Program in Qatar. Cureus. 2022 Dec 6;14(12).
9. Corley DA, Jensen CD, Marks AR. Can we improve adenoma detection rates? a systematic review of intervention studies. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;74(3):656–65.
10. Koïvogui A, Vincelet C, Abihsera G, Ait-Hadad H, Delattre H, Le Trung T, Bernoux A, Carroll R, Nicolet J. Supply and quality of colonoscopy according to the characteristics of gastroenterologists in the French population-based colorectal-cancer screening program. World J Gastroenterol. 2023 Mar 3;29(9):1492.
11. Theunissen F, Lantinga MA, Ter Borg PC, Ouwendijk RJ, Siersema PD, Bruno MJ; Trans. IT Foundation Study Group. Efficacy of different bowel preparation regimen volumes for colorectal cancer screening and compliance with European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy performance measures. United European Gastroenterol J. 2023 Jun;11(5):448-457
12. Clark BT, Protiva P, Nagar A, Imaeda A, Ciarleglio MM, Deng Y, Laine L. Quantification of adequate bowel preparation for screening or surveillance colonoscopy in men. Gastroenterology. 2016 Feb 1;150(2):396-405.
13. Rajappa S, Singh M, Uehara R, Schachterle SE, Setia S. Cancer incidence and mortality trends in Asia based on regions and human development index levels: an analyses from GLOBOCAN 2020. Curr Med Res Opin. 2023 Aug 3;39(8):1127-37.
14. Hsu WF, Chiu HM. Optimization of colonoscopy quality: comprehensive review of the literature and future perspectives. Dig Endosc. 2023 Nov;35(7):822-34.
15. Winawer S, Fletcher R, Rex D, Bond J, Burt R, Ferrucci J, Ganiats T, Levin T, Woolf S, Johnson D, Kirk L. Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance: clinical guidelines and rationale—update based on new evidence. Gastroenterology. 2003 Feb 1;124(2):544-60.
16. Republic of Iraq, Ministry of Health and Environment Iraqi Cancer Board, Annual Report Iraqi Cancer Registry 2019 page(1).
17. Ra S. Cancer Screening in the United States, 2010: a review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and issues in cancer screening. Ca Cancer J Clin. 2010;60:99-119.
18. Tamer A, Korkut E, Korkmaz U, Akcan Y. Lower gastrointestinal endoscopy findings: Duzce area. Kocatepe Tıp Dergisi. 2005 Jan 4;6(1):29-31.
19. Sano Y, Hotta K, Matsuda T, Murakami Y, Fujii T, Kudo SE, Oda Y, Ishikawa H, Saito Y, Kobayashi N, Sekiguchi M. Endoscopic removal of premalignant lesions reduces long-term colorectal cancer risk: results from the Japan Polyp Study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023 Aug 6. 22(3)
20. Mulder SA, Kranse R, Damhuis RA, de Wilt JH, Rob J, Kuipers EJ, van Leerdam ME. Prevalence and prognosis of synchronous colorectal cancer: a Dutch population-based study. Cancer Epidemiol. 2011 Oct 1;35(5):442-7.
21. Calderwood AH, Tosteson TD, Wang Q, Onega T, Walter LC. Association of life expectancy with surveillance colonoscopy findings and follow-up recommendations in older adults. JAMA Intern Med. 2023 May 1;183(5):426-34.
22. Rex DK, Sullivan AW, Perkins AJ, Vemulapalli KC. Colorectal polyp prevalence and aspirational detection targets determined using high definition colonoscopy and a high level detector in 2017. Dig Liver Dis. 2020 Jan 1;52(1):72-8.
23. Li K, Fathan MI, Patel K, Zhang T, Zhong C, Bansal A, Rastogi A, Wang JS, Wang G. Colonoscopy polyp detection and classification: dataset creation and comparative evaluations. PLoSOne. 2021 Aug 17;16(8):e0255809.
24. Bowles CJ, Leicester R, Romaya C, Swarbrick E, Williams CB, Epstein O. A prospective study of colonoscopy practice in the UK today: are we adequately prepared for national colorectal cancer screening tomorrow? Gut. 2004;53:277-283.
25. Kang YS, Kamm MA, Engel AF, Talbot IC. Pathology of the rectal wall in solitary rectal ulcer syndrome and complete rectal prolapse. Gut. 1996;38:587-590.
26. Qari Y, Mosli M. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy of medical treatments for the management of solitary rectal ulcer syndrome. Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2020 Jan;26(1):4.

Similar Articles

1-10 of 29

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.